This 7 days a California federal court docket simultaneously upheld the intent of a federal bill to defend point out medical marijuana packages, and sent a scathing rebuke to the federal Drug Enforcement Administration for making an attempt to circumvent the regulation.
At challenge was the DEA’s interpretation of the Rohrabacher-Farr modification to the shelling out bill passed in December 2014. The amendment lists the states that have healthcare marijuana packages, and gives that the Department of Justice may perhaps not use federal funds to “prevent such States from utilizing their possess Point out rules that authorize the use, distribution, possession, or cultivation of medical cannabis.”
In spite of the simplicity of the amendment, a leaked memo uncovered that the DEA interpreted the language not as protecting against federal prosecution of folks and businesses who carry out medical marijuana guidelines, but somewhat as just protecting against the DEA from interfering with the operations of “states” them selves. The amendment would find the money for the people, dispensaries, physicians, and other people applying point out clinical marijuana packages no defense less than the DEA’s interpretation.
The good thing is for all those who advantage from these plans, Choose Charles Breyer of the Northern District of California rejected the DEA’s arguments. In a strongly-worded final decision, Choose Breyer wrote that the DEA’s interpretation of the amendment is “counterintuitive and opportunistic,” “defies language and logic,” “tortures the simple this means of the statute” and is “at odds with elementary notions of the rule of legislation.” Choose Breyer ruled that the injunction against the Marin Alliance for Health care Marijuana (MAMM), the dispensary that brought the fit, can only be enforced to the extent that MAMM may well violate state – not federal – regulation.
In addition to correctly lifting the injunction against MAMM, this ruling is a victory for point out medical marijuana plans nationwide. It may possibly send a concept to the DoJ that endeavours to evade the intent of the Rorbacher-Farr modification – and upcoming legislation – will not be prosperous likely ahead.
This ruling should really permit medical marijuana sufferers and vendors in 23 states and the District of Columbia relaxation a very little easier, and serve as a reminder that the tide of the war on marijuana is turning.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here